| 000 | 01662nam a22003378i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 391614 | ||
| 005 | 20170630135249.0 | ||
| 008 | 150202r20172013enk f 001|0|eng|d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781138915114 (pbk.) : _c£29.99 |
||
| 020 | _a1138915114 | ||
| 035 | _a(StDuBDS)9781138915114 | ||
| 040 |
_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda _dUK-BfC |
||
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW _2eflch |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW _2ukslc |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aCrofts, Penny, _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWickedness and crime : _blaws of homicide and malice / _cPenny Crofts. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon : _bRoutledge, _c2015. |
|
| 300 |
_axii, 285 pages ; _c24 cm |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _aOriginally published: 2013. | ||
| 520 | 8 | _aPenny Crofts examines how criminal legal doctrine and jurisprudence organises and expresses ideas about wickedness through the prism of malice. Whilst many legal theorists accept that the criminal legal system is a system of blaming, they do not consider that blaming involves censure or reproof for fault, wrong, badness or wickedness. Historically, the link between criminal law and morality was explicit, and expressed through evaluative terms in offence formulae such as malice and mens rea. Now, however, there is a tendency to think of crime in neutral procedural terms and to avoid reference to its normative elements. | |
| 521 | _aSpecialized. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aSociological jurisprudence _xPhilosophy. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLaw. _2eflch |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLaw. _2ukslc |
|
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c56035 _d56035 |
||